The algorithm is called "The Scientific Method" - what we often think of as science is actually 'the set of results which come from that algorithm".


Science, for example, never denied that there might be Hydra and Unicorns and whatnot in the world - it was that there would be formed an umbrella of information which had been differentiated from the noise of the universe by

- the hypothesis/test/reframe algorithm
- the replicability algorithm (cold fusion anyone?)
and
- the documentation algorithm


Now if our dear unsubscribed author points to 'the implications attributed to the information differentiated from the noise using the algorithm of science' - there probably IS a fundamental error - the information in the umbrella under 'science' never claimed to point beyond itself. Science obsesses over the empirical truth - such truth being only findable in a rigidly controlled environment. Which the rest of the world never is!

As embodied in this framing:

In Theory, there is no difference between Theory and Practice.

In Practice, there is.


;-b